Mom & Pop Psychology
Your company has a personality all its own. Find out what it is.
Over the years, as Sandra Fekete worked with the clients of her $1.2 million
Columbus, Ohio, marketing firm, she came to suspect that most of them had a
skewed idea of their companies. "I'd be on the phone with them or in their
offices, trying to get to the root of what makes their company special," she
recalls, "but then I'd go out to their plants and see something totally
different."
That disconnect led Fekete to believe not only that companies take on a life
of their own, but that they actually develop their own quirks, ticks, and
personality traits—traits that usually differ radically from those of the CEO's
own personality or even the personalities of the staff. To test out her ideas,
she decided to conduct an experiment with her own business, Fekete + Co.,
designing a personality test based on the Myers-Briggs test for her company. The
results bore her out: The company's personality type didn't match that of anyone
on the staff, yet it accurately described the organization. "Our company had an
almost bull-headed personality, a type that was convinced it was right and took
exception to being questioned," she says. "If it had been a person, it would
have been someone who came across as condescending."
The test results made Fekete realize that she and her staff were to blame for
a frequent breakdown in communication with clients. After getting initial client
approval, "we would take the ball and run with it," she says, "failing to get
client feedback in the development process. Our independent nature ignored
clients' need to be included." To fix that, she added client contact to her
staff's daily to-do lists. "If we hadn't talked for a while, we'd initiate a
call or meeting to keep the client in the loop," she says. Fekete's staff also
invited all clients to a quarterly "meeting of minds" to discuss new marketing
strategies face-to-face. And to make clients feel appreciated, Fekete began to
send them birthday cards and personal letters on their anniversary with her
company. Since initiating those changes, she says, she has landed many new
accounts through word-of-mouth.
The test Fekete devised is based on one developed 50 years ago by the
mother-daughter team of Katherine Briggs and Isabel Myers. The Myers-Briggs Type
Indicator draws on psychoanalyst Carl Jung's theories that there are common
behavioral patterns in the way people perceive and process information. It
determines individuals' personality traits based on their preferences among
those mental processes. "Myers-Briggs is widely used across many employment and
counseling settings," says psychologist and management professor Peter Bycio, of
Xavier University in Cincinnati. "I feel it's best used in promoting
understanding of interpersonal differences and teambuilding."
Eighty percent of CEOs have a perception of the company
that differs from that of the staff.
Fekete turned her theories into a book, Companies Are People Too .
She believes that by taking her test, CEOs can better understand their company's
character, play up its strengths, shore up its weaknesses, and improve the
firm's focus on its core values. Her test breaks down company temperaments into
16 personality types using Myers-Briggs categories: internal versus external,
sensing versus intuitive, thinking versus feeling, and perceiving versus
judging. Internal companies tend to work individually and rely on ideas
generated from within; external companies are outgoing and seek partnerships
with other firms. Sensing firms tend to be pragmatic; intuitive companies
emphasize innovation. Thinking companies value logic and fairness; feeling
companies, group harmony and people issues. Judging companies are rigidly
organized, while perceiving companies like to leave their options open.
When Fekete gives the test to companies, the results often shock the CEO. In
fact, 80% of CEOs have a perception of the the company that differs from the
perception of the rest of the staff. "Sometimes it's hard to mentally separate
yourself from your company to take an objective look," notes Fekete. "It could
also mean that the CEO's vision is out of touch with the daily operation of the
company. It's really easy for that to happen, because leaders can't always be
out in the trenches."
Bob Rothschild, CEO of gourmet food maker Robert Rothschild Berry Farm, based
in Urbana, Ohio, was a tad disappointed when the test showed his company had
strengths such as dependability, high quality, and customer service. He wanted
innovation to be its strength. Still, he decided to embrace the company's
strengths and play them up in its promotional materials—a move he credits with
increasing revenue 25%. At the same time, he set up cross-departmental
brainstorming and innovation teams that met twice a month, which generated fresh
marketing ideas.
Fekete says that all company types have strengths and weaknesses, but that
some dispositions seem better fitted to certain industries. Take Dixon Schwabl,
an advertising agency based in Victor, N.Y. Its test results categorized it as a
dependable, efficient, logical, and often rigid firm. "That's more of a
manufacturing mentality," says Fekete. But for an ad agency, it meant that the
creative people were being overshadowed and didn't feel valued. "We were always
known as a company that could crank things out and give our customers a quick
turnaround," says owner Mike Schwabl. After seeing the test results, Schwabl
felt a change was needed to help the company grow.
Schwabl took conscious steps to create a more playful work environment and
put more focus on rewarding the contributions of the creative staff. Now every
new hire is handed a water gun, employees can get to the first floor from the
second by a slide, and the offices include a "primal scream room" for blowing
off steam. He also instituted weekly creative team lunches and staff outings and
gave his creative team more responsibility and freedom. "They're more motivated
to do great work, and it's become easier to attract new employees," he says. But
the company had to reeducate its customers. "We made a conscious effort to let
clients know that if they want our best work, it's going to take a little
longer," he recalls, "The results of a better product won them over." Buzz about
the agency's work has grown, helping bring in a large new contract with
paint-maker Benjamin Moore.
A year after the initial survey, Dixon Schwabl now tests as a spontaneous,
innovative, energetic place—which is more consistent with the fun-loving,
creative company that Schwabl wanted it to be. "It's brought the team together,"
he says.
Sidebar: What's Your Company's Personality?
Diagnose your business's type with Fekete's test
1. We are most energized about:
a. working directly with customers and other people b. developing ideas,
products, and services in-house
2. We communicate internally by:
a. in-person chats and phone calls b. notes, memos, letters, and
e-mail
3. Our company reacts to change:
a. quickly b. after giving it some thought
4. Our new products and services are:
a. cost-effective, practical extensions of successful products or services
b. innovative ideas, often different from the current product line
5. Our company is best described as:
a. practical b. innovative
6. Our company values:
a. common sense more than imagination b. imagination more than common
sense
7. The potential impact of a decision on employees and others is:
a. rarely considered b. usually a factor in the decision
8. Our company expects workers to:
a. leave their personal problems at home b. be supportive and caring when
co-workers have problems
9. Our company tends to believe:
a. people don't have to like each other to work together well b. group
harmony is important to get jobs done well
10. Meetings tend to:
a. follow a set, often written, agenda b. have a general purpose,
allowing the project to evolve
11. After decisions are made, our company is more likely to:
a. develop follow-up plans, assign responsibility, and set a schedule b.
leave the option open for changing the decision later
12. Our company is:
a. decisive and regimented b. reasonably organized chaos
Answer key
Back
|